Keeping your photo bags and cases
free from moisture is only part of the story, especially if you keep them in an
enclosed environment, a closet or drawer, without circulating air, where
moisture can accumulate (especially in the cold spots of the house). Over the
years, I have accumulated quite some gear, so I needed to buy a small closet where
to keep my toys. Now, you can buy an air dehumidifier and replenish the
adsorber (calcium chloride) as time goes by. The trouble is, these
dehumidifiers are quite bulky, taking much of your precious closet space, as it
was in my case. It's still better to have this place for storage of more
lenses, isn't it? I came up with a cheap solution: a dehumidifier made from a
soft drink bottle.
This is all you need: a stocking, a bottle and calcium chloride. |
Put the adsorber inside the stocking of the assembled "device". |
Just get a wide-neck bottle and
put inside a short nylon stocking. Fix everything with one or two elastic
bands. This stocking will serve to contain the adsorber (calcium chloride), suspended above bottle's bottom, while the
wide bottleneck ensures more moisture adsorbing capacity. Fill the stocking
with calcium chloride (it is much cheaper to buy it bulk). With time, the
liquid (saturated calcium chloride solution) will accumulate on the bottom.
Dispose the liquid down the drain (it is safe) and replenish the stocking with
fresh calcium chloride as needed. That's it!
The dehumidifier in its place, along with a thermo/hygrometer. |
The same thing can be made from a
jar, of course (provided you have enough room). Oh, and a good measure is also
to have a small, cheap thermometer/hygrometer located in this place (you can
get one for a few bucks). You will be amazed how much humidity changes,
depending on the weather. Our goal is to keep relative humidity under 60 %,
which is thought to be (mostly) safe in terms of fungal growth. However, r.h. under
35 % is also bad, since lens and camera mechanisms are more likely to get too
dry (less lubrication). Fortunately, the latter condition is less likely to
occur, in most places.
No comments:
Post a Comment